<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the meaning of &quot;beta&quot; version&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cberger.net/2008/12/14/on-the-meaning-of-beta-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cberger.net/2008/12/14/on-the-meaning-of-beta-version/</link>
	<description>What I do, where I live, what I think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kofler</title>
		<link>http://blog.cberger.net/2008/12/14/on-the-meaning-of-beta-version/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kofler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyrilleberger.wordpress.com/2008/12/14/on-the-meaning-of-beta-version#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s not just Web 2.0 which is causing this effect. There&#039;s plenty of software which releases only beta releases in years, either because they don&#039;t have the necessary manpower to complete their release objectives or because they&#039;re just scared of declaring the release &quot;official&quot;. I&#039;m guilty of it myself, just look at TIGCC, where I in fact absolutely recommend that everyone should use only beta versions, the &quot;stable&quot; version being completely outdated and actually more buggy than the betas. But TIGCC is by far not the only project like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s not just Web 2.0 which is causing this effect. There&#8217;s plenty of software which releases only beta releases in years, either because they don&#8217;t have the necessary manpower to complete their release objectives or because they&#8217;re just scared of declaring the release &#8220;official&#8221;. I&#8217;m guilty of it myself, just look at TIGCC, where I in fact absolutely recommend that everyone should use only beta versions, the &#8220;stable&#8221; version being completely outdated and actually more buggy than the betas. But TIGCC is by far not the only project like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
